More On That Beer Writing Code Of Conduct Idea

Andy has another good post up this week about the sorts of ethical standards of journalism as (what I would argue) befits that particular corner (but not the other corners) of what I consider collectively to be "beer writing." I won't copy his bit (as you can follow the link above) but I did want to post my (sad putative attempt of a) comment from earlier, rejected (utterly) due to my (undeniable) need to include a link at the end of it was not acceptable to Andy's (normally quite unmoderated) comment leaving system:

I think this is an example of where I think we are missing the idea of sliding scales (as opposed to slippery slopes).
- First, I assume all beer writing is tempered or effected by the beer itself. We like it. It makes us write about the pleasures of its consumption and the related pleasures of learning about its production and producers.

- Second, I also assume that the conviviality and generosity of beer and beer folk must overlap into the description of any beer experience. This may include the free dinner I am getting tonight care of Southern Tier and its importer and the odd brewer tour whether at the level of me showing up in the mini-van at Jolly Pumpkin and getting an hour of Ron's time as well as Lew going to see the hop fields. Beer and brewers are generous to those that love the product and production. That is also part of the joy of beer, the fifth voice in the quartette as it were. [In undergrad we even spoke of "beer money" - money borrowed to buy beer should only be repaid if the first lender later needed beer himself.]

- Third, I don't think integrity is automatically compromised by the presence of either the intoxication or conviviality of beer, brewing and brewers. We have to remember that all beer writers have an entre into the world of beer and that is the the mutual benefit of the writer, the brewer as well as the reader/consumer. Michael Jackson's reference to his mere access to Girardin or his familiarity and friendships with monkish brewers (things I will never experience, I am sure) were of more benefit to him and created value in the strengthening of his reputation as a free airflight.

- Fourth, I think any code of conduct must take the points above to heart and adapt them to the various levels of beer writing which, at one apex of the craft, may include that sort of sterile business reporting I likely have litle use for (and which we often learn is actually absent from much general business journalism).

I will reiterate this. I think this discussion is extremely valuable. It can only be advanced through illustration of actual work not as a "gothca!" but as an honest exploration so that I will know what these sort of photos actually mean.
See, I was being cheeky...yet on point if you notice who is in that photo. So now you can be cheeky about me if you like in return as I am now off on a glorious half-day vacation to drive the 401 to Toronto to enjoy the benefit of a comp tickie to a dinner just as I myself have been the conduit whereby others have received comps this same weekend.
Hmmm, some of those folks look familiar. I've been on two trips total, one sponsored by an importer and the other, the above-mentioned one, by the Bavarian Government. While on the first, I talked about the issue of such trips with the other assembled beer writers, most of whom didn't see much problem. I eventually wrote about it, disclosed the free stuff upfront, and actually felt an obligation to be more critical than I otherwise would have been. On the second, I had less of a problem with a trip sponsored by a government organization and not by individual breweries. Now, I'm not sure that even the diffuse nature of that trip creates much of a distinction and I don't think we should be taking these trips. I again raised the free trips issue on the German trip and this time, many people saw the conflict. Now, I think several of those folks will be headed to STL for a trip I think most (including one invited writer on my site's comments) agree is problematic. As I said over on Stan's site, no one is without sin on these issues. Mine are out there...now what about the creeping, quieter ones for which there are no pictures and no disclosure...

Best,

Andy

P.S. My site gave me no warning it rejected any comments (damned automation). I'll have to check the link issue.

Now then. Your link to that photograph of the US beer writers in Germany brings us to another point: dishonest profile photos from journalists. They are common, but that doesn't make them any less unacceptable.

One of the people in that website looks like he put his head on upside down, and is not unlike a young Uncle Albert from Only Fools and Horses. You would never guess it from the photos on his own website. He isn't the only culprit but perhaps the most comical.

Ooops!!! I just deleted Lew's comment as well as Stoch's last complaint about this all being boring. Damn. I just got back from a day away and deleted about 150 spam comments and offed Lew's in doing so. I will see if I can recover it...but sorry about that.
OK I'll just repeat my comment.

THIS IS DEATHLY BORING!

Can my favourite North American beer blogs please drag themselves out of this morass of navel-gazing nonsense please?

I appreciate what you are saying, Stonch, but I have to add another link as Jay makes an extended and well considered post on this as well.
Nah...I'm with Stonch. I'm bored.
Post a Reply
:
:
(optional)
:
(optional)
Your email address will be displayed with your reply.
:
Are You Human?: