Stan posted this four and a half minute video for Deschutes beer and I was surprised to find that I had an entirely different response to the thing than he did. I found it oddly creepy while he admitted he was "a sucker for these sorts of things." The strange thing I thought was how - for one of the first times that I can remember - I was maybe getting turned off about a beer I really liked. A brewery I liked. So, I thought I should think about that a bit more.
There is a good comparator. Stone. See, Jeff said certain things about Greg from Stone and Greg responded. In that response Greg from Stone set out all the things I dislike about his approach to thinking about beer - the boring narcissism, the ever present first person pronouns "I, me, mine". But he does not shake my interest in buying his beer because for the most part it is very good beer at a very good price. I can avoid Greg and the dumb grade 8 back of the glass gargoyle branding thing. It is good for me and Stone that things work out this way. I get to take what I like and pay for the pleasure.
My take on the Deschutes video is like that. Like Greg from Stone, it says a lot of things that may be good and reasonable things but does so in a way that makes me uncomfortable. Even though the vid's tone is entirely unlike a loud diatribe or self back slapping session it still leads me to think thoughts like this:
♦ There is something creepy in the voyeuristic decision to have the girl strip off her shirt and turn back for good measure. Or are we to think that sexism and beer can't touch craft breweries.
♦ There is something odd about the need to grab her off the street and the choice to include the banjo. I own two banjos but appreciate the have that creepy thing associated with them. Your average baritone ukelele or maybe a mandolin would have done the trick.
♦ There are no other people other than far way on that bridge by the pond. Is it intentionally surreal? Or is the message that good Deschutes beer best fits a post apocalyptic landscape. Did he see someone in the gas station and what did he do when he did? And what is the message that she reads at the bottom of a page. He wrote at the top. Is there some suggestion of misunderstanding?
♦ Building on that, there is a tone that is like something out of a movie by Bruce MacDonald or Don McKeller. Maybe it's that the bit of the US being filmed aligns with southern Canada, the setting looks less like wilderness to me and more like the landscape of Road Kill, the moment a bit like Last Night. I keep thinking she is going to off him. Solve her little problem once and for all. The message just fits into her master plan, creates opportunity.
So, I am thinking it is a Canadian thing maybe. Road trip movies often don't work out all that well up here. There's danger. There's bears in the woods, not just make believe empty campsites with no one out there out to the horizon. But, like Greg of Stone going on and on, it doesn't matter. The beer is still tasty and reasonably priced. Wish they were both in my town and not just something I can find on the road. If I really have to go on the road.






Comments
Alan - January 23, 2012 9:00 PM
Within fifteen minutes of posting this, a pal on Facebook posted a picture of a moose attacking a man on a snowmobile. That's what really happens in the woods.
Stan Hieronymus - January 23, 2012 9:34 PM
Alan - As we bantered back and forth about this during the day I continued to think we were talking about two different things. I'm probably wrong - just based on percentages - but now I'm thinking it is that it is a matter of viewing the video/commercial from an entirely different viewpoint. And not just the whole woods thing because I've camped in the woods of central Oregon.
You are looking at is at a Deschutes commercial - fair enough, since that's what it was. I am looking at it as decent music, nice pictures, people enjoying themselves. That's the primary reason I linked to it.
Alan - January 23, 2012 9:36 PM
No, I am looking at it as a vid. A music video or a short movie. But these are actors giving a message. Just have no idea what it is.
Alan - January 23, 2012 9:43 PM
But going on the down means "Going Down The Road" too.
Dan - January 23, 2012 11:19 PM
Obviously, I'm not the demographic they are targeting. I'm too old I guess. It's a pastiche of every cliche the outside holds concerning the self-absorbed young residents of Oregon.
Jeff Alworth - January 24, 2012 2:30 AM
Alan, I am mystified by your mystification. When I first saw it, I was surprised by the nudity as well, but otherwise, this is as pure and obvious a narrative as I've ever seen. I'm not actually sure what you're not getting.
- Girl strips off her shirt to go skinny dipping. True, she's half nekkid onscreen for about a second, but this is, narratively anyway, in keeping with the whole camping trip. Oregon waters are meant to be swum in. (Except the ocean, where you have nine seconds before lethal hypothermia sets in.)
- He doesn't grab her off the street. They've had a fight and he's shown up on her Portland doorstep to woo her. She isn't exactly wooed--it will take a few days in Oregon's outdoors to seal the deal, but she allows the wooing to begin. How is this not clear? And they might have chosen the banjo because, oh, I don't know, the song starts ... with a banjo.
- The bridge is across Mirror Pond. Maybe this is only evident to Oregonians, but the whole little movie is a document of Deschutes locations. You start with Mirror Pond, then see Black Butte Mountain, the obsidian fields from Obsidian Stout, an moment of inversion, where clouds are below and the clear sky is above, and so on. This stuff is catnip to Oregonians, incidentally.
- It's not really Oregon's fault that the landscape reminds you of a slasher flick, I don't think. Or anyway, not Deschutues'. Since they named their beers after local landmarks and the film--cleverly called Land Marks--trots us past them, they couldn't do a lot about that.
I'm also not sure what's unclear about the notebook. He's wooing. She's letting him. He sneaks a chance to write something romantic in the notebook. She is charmed. And wrap.
I could see how the "twee urbanity" (to use a phrase from the New Yorker when they discussed Portlandia) would offend. I could see how the plot, which panders to our sentimentality and cheats by using beautiful Oregon as an accomplice, would irritate. And I could see how you'd rather they, you know, talk about the beer. All fair enough.
I give Deschutes credit for trying a different kind of marketing and attempting to communicate what they think about their beer. Stan said it's about beer in people's lives, and that's what Deschutes is communicating. If you're young and living a good and true Oregon life, you have Deschutes along. Thirty years ago, Henry Weinhard's did the <a href=http://beervana.blogspot.com/2006/10/blitz-weinhard-commercial-from-60s.html>exact same thing</a>.
I don't know, maybe it's just too densely Oregonian for others to get. It's really designed to ring our bells. (And it works.)
Alan - January 24, 2012 8:20 AM
Thanks for the italics, Jeff. That sure helps make me agree with you. Great rhetorical style. But "too... X... for others to get"? Really? Let me know when you feel comfortable enough to lower yourself to my level anytime you want to talk.
Back to the movie and off the regionalista rage, I now think he is really trying to training her to be a beer ticker. That's what the notes in the book are about. He wrote "87/100" next to her Mirror Pond label. When she looks up, she now knows what she needs to do. And no one will hear him scream.
Thomas Cizauskas - January 24, 2012 9:21 AM
Budweiser had its Clydesdales. Deschutes has skinny-dipping. I choose the latter.
Alan - January 24, 2012 10:37 AM
See, that's where this is leading. It's the innocent who suffer.
Jeff Alworth - January 24, 2012 1:12 PM
Alan, I was not intending to be a jerk, I was just exasperated. I apologize for the tone.
Imagine it was written in more gracious manner but with all the same points. I didn't actually intend to convince you of anything, but I was trying to take up your offer of discussion (rather than close it off). How would you have responded to it then?
Alan - January 24, 2012 1:32 PM
No, it is I who are giving you the gears. I was too gruff but left it up to then apologize rather than pretend that I never snarked. Better to have snarked and apologized... than to... than to...
I can't complete that. How would I have reacted? I think it is more fun not arguing about this as the art itself (a short film) seems to be attracting plenty of responses from a wide range of view with a wide range of conclusions. I have to be honest with myself about it but must also admit how it reflects upon myself.
So if I am not 48 going on 49, if I go back to the years of single-hood and dating 30 years ago, as an early undergrad I would have thought the music was a real sell out as bands don't place music in commercials; I would have thought the nudity jarring and out of place; I would have found the love story artificial, querky and 2D. But as similar or replicating empty landscape is so common in Canada and, as I am not from where you are, not iconic, it's just a barren in bits. It creates a certain response in me not only because of the (sub-)slasher feel but the apparent mindlessness of the characters. They sure drink a lot on their dirty weekend.
But it reaches for something which is to be congratulated if not rewarded. It is not another "Hooray for Brewers" boring boring video. I wish it did not make the beer seem like a drink for disfunctional loners. But I am pleased with the effort and would want to see more of this sort of thing as, above all, it tries to notice that drinkers actually exist in the supply chain.
Jeff Alworth - January 24, 2012 1:50 PM
Another interesting thing about the gambit is that Deschutes plopped this on their blog and pretty much did nothing else. Zero promotion. It came out months ago.
If I were to put on my "brand" hat, I'd say this was an effort to dodge the geezer set and market directly to young drinkers (who might have fifty years of brand loyalty to offer). Oldsters like us have already been through the histrionics of youth and it seems vaguely embarrassing to us--and phony. But if you're 25, this probably looks edgy and honest. Anyway, I bet that's the calculus Deschutes was working with.
Whether that makes it more or less admirable is hard to say.
Alan - January 24, 2012 2:15 PM
Well, if I have to be honest if I have anything to give the good people of Deschutes it's whatever level of buzz my little drum can generate. I think detailed comment and all these multiple perspectives gives them lots of great feedback. I can't imagine they are of the boneheaded obstructionist school of client feedback gathering.
Zac - January 24, 2012 2:22 PM
Wow. Alan, I appreciate that you have your own perspective on this video and are willing to stand by it. We'll have to agree to disagree, I suppose.
FWIW, I think Jeff nails it. I also think your accusation of sexism is a bit hyperbolic. It's not as if the camera lingers over the woman's exposed breast. There's a brief moment where she's making herself vulnerable to him and it's playful to boot. Still, I'll have to show it to my partner who's a Women's Studies prof to see what she thinks.
Alan - January 24, 2012 2:30 PM
Get back to us on that. We have months of work ahead of us!
Zac - January 24, 2012 2:34 PM
Don't worry. I will.
Jeff Alworth - January 24, 2012 4:29 PM
I would be shocked if someone from Deschutes hasn't read this. (Hi, Gary!) My guess is they're delighted.
Incidentally, one more comment on the "too Oregonian for others to get" which can indeed sound dickish. My point was that Oregonians are famously parochial and we love love love any reference to Oregon. So littering an ad with Oregon landmarks is wise dog-whistle stuff. Rubes like me lap it up. I can see, however, how it might not be universally seductive.
ATJ - January 24, 2012 5:21 PM
I must admit from a British perspective it was pretty cool, bit road trip-ish, not sure about the music, but it was miles better than something like the Bombardier advert, which was all shouting and innuendo — for me this was about beer being low key sexiness and love and just being there (was probably more shocked that such a demure looking babe would have a whole arm sleeved, but then that’s just me…).
Jason Randles - January 24, 2012 6:28 PM
Landmarks is a film we put together to tell a story, to visually connect the names of our beers to the Central Oregon landmarks for which they were named. It's not intended to be a commercial but a short artistic film that we feel communicates what the Deschutes brand is all about. We love the fact that it is creating conversation and have enjoyed reading the blog posts that have popped up this week. Like art, and certain styles of beer, not everyone will appreciate it, and that's ok. But we didn't want to play it safe because we knew if we did, conversations like these wouldn't happen. So we took a risk and pushed the envelope a little bit to grab your attention. Thanks for watching the film and for taking the time to post your comments. Cheers.
olllllo - January 24, 2012 6:48 PM
Whoops, the Po Po.
Quiet everyone.
Alan - January 24, 2012 9:03 PM
I wonder how the same video works to National Velvet's "68 Hours"? Maybe that's what's been bouncing around in my head when I think creepy.
Alan - January 26, 2012 1:31 PM
People talking about people talking about this.