
Editorial Update: I got an email from the person in question in this post and upon reflection it is a bit harsh of me to use "stunnedest". I still think there is far too little written about calories and beer and the reference to "tea" was not helpful so I am leaving the post up but, yes and as noted, most drinkers do not gun a six pack each time they enjoy a good beer. Though many do. Perhaps it was a grumpy week for me. Who knows. Please leave a comment on this reflection if you wish.
This is one of the funnier quotes I have read from someone whose livelihood involves getting people to buy more good beer:
The beer belly myth is also something McClelland would like to help dispel. "A lot of Canadians perceive that beer is high in calories, or fattening," he said. "That's one of the reasons many females shy away from beer." But beer is actually low in calories, McClelland said. "It's probably just somewhere above water and tea."
Tea? TEA??? I am sure Mr McClelland is a real nice guy but that is just about the stunnedest idea I have ever heard. As we have known for some time, beer packs a pretty decent caloric punch. Adding a six pack of something as light as Blue Moon to your diet adds about enough calories to add 1/3 of a pound to your bulk if you don't do something about it. Move up to the high alcohol bombers with double digit strength and you might as well be sucking back cake icing. People with interests in beer sales don't like mentioning this but no one without that interest really denies it. While recent study of Canadians indicate that the overall numbers of the most serious implications are actually lower than I would have thought, the ratio of beer benefits to beer detriments is established at a very sobering 1:10. No one really doubted that, right?
Lesson: make sure that when you are getting health advice about beer or otherwise that you are listening to someone whose specialty is medicine and not brew consulting or wholesale beer sales.






Comments
Craig - February 7, 2012 9:51 PM
Did McClelland leave a job with the tobacco industry for the import beer biz?
Alan - February 7, 2012 9:56 PM
TEA!!!!
Rebecca - February 7, 2012 10:58 PM
"That's one of the reasons many females shy away from beer."
I hope the reason for me taking issue with that statement is pretty self-explanatory. Though most of the men and women I know do enjoy beer, the only women I have met who don't like beer have attributed that to not enjoying the taste of beer they've tried, and not the perceived calorie content. (And I'm not just talking about Bud, Miller, Coors, etc.)
Alan - February 7, 2012 11:05 PM
I had not thought that to be a key fib but it's there, isn't it. You want to know an interesting fact? I know lots of guys who don't actually like the taste of beer, too. Wine guys. Rye and ginger guys. Is that another uncomfortable truth?
Ethan - February 8, 2012 12:52 AM
I guess it really depends on how you define 'beer,' since I note here that Budweiser Select 55 has--wait for it--55 calories!
Steve Lamond - February 8, 2012 4:27 AM
Noone is born liking beer...you have to train yourself onto bitterness. I don't see how it a 1:10 pro:con there's a lot going for beer
Craig - February 8, 2012 8:42 AM
Well, he is correct in saying that beer has a caloric content above water. It helps that water doesn't have any calories at all—at least my water doesn't.
Pok - February 11, 2012 12:21 AM
Last time I checked a pint of beer had equal calories to a pint of OJ. A pint of OJ can't be bad can it?
Alan - February 11, 2012 11:19 AM
Who has a six of OJ watching the game?