Finally! An ethical question that is not about the ethics of beer writing. I ask because, as I mentioned, Fuller's XX Strong Ale came to town on Saturday. Bought three, had two, gave away one. Then I noticed I was out. So I went back today. I had noticed 17 bottles were listed on the LCBO web site as still being on the one shelf at the one store in the region likely to get them. There were 12 when I got to the store. Might never see this one single run beer with limited supplies making it to North America. I took six.
Was this piggish of me? I have no intention of sharing or even having them soon. Pure rat packery. Mine. Mine. Mine. Christmas is coming and if Santa disappoints I really might have to step in on my own behalf. I am happy. But was I wrong?






Comments
Herb Meowing - November 14, 2011 8:23 PM
The customer is entitled to buy as much as (s)he wants.
If the store wants to ensure its clientèle get a crack at a limited supply...then it's their responsibility to set a limit.
Cory OBrien - November 14, 2011 8:59 PM
I agree with Herb. You have no way of knowing who else is trying to buy them, and for what reason, so buy as many as you want/can afford/need. If it's a limited supply, the store can set a limit, and you should obey that, but no sense in limiting yourself. (Assuming of course that you plan to drink/give away/cellar the beer yourself. If you're just buying it up to try and resell it for a profit, then you're being greedy and should leave some for others.)
Jennifer Lawson - November 14, 2011 11:47 PM
You snooze, you lose!
Bailey - November 15, 2011 6:43 AM
The only thing you did wrong was not smashing the remaining bottles on the shelf as you ran out of the shop laughing maniacally.
Craig - November 15, 2011 8:11 AM
I like Bailey's take. Although, I still haven't had it—so break all but one.
Alan - November 15, 2011 8:15 AM
I had no idea that I wrote for such a mass of selfish beasts. So much for "beer community"! You are all micro-Thatcherites, out for #1.
Chris Barrett - November 15, 2011 9:01 AM
I've been watching that on-hand count at Barrack St. from here in Ottawa wondering whether I was going to get a chance to be piggish. I'm debating sending my father downtown to grab some in Kingston before they disappear.
The Professor - November 15, 2011 11:00 AM
Feel no guilt.
I would have bought them all!
Barm - November 15, 2011 11:37 AM
It is only beer. People will survive if they don't get any of a particular brew.
Alan - November 15, 2011 11:40 AM
I am gutted. Does no one feel my pain?
Ryan B Anderson - November 15, 2011 1:21 PM
It seems as though someone needs to be a contrarian and tell you that you are a jerk, so I will be that guy. You are a jerk
Alan - November 15, 2011 1:29 PM
Whew. What a relief. Thanks.
Ethan - November 15, 2011 1:57 PM
I would certainly feel no fear nor fetter upon espying, then buying, them all.
Dan Smallbeer - November 15, 2011 7:16 PM
If you buy a lot, they will order more next time and everyone will benefit. That's classical hop-hooverin' trickledown economics.
Alan - November 15, 2011 9:08 PM
Finite supply of the best stuff - that's one of the classic failures of trickle down economics
Jeff Alworth - November 16, 2011 4:12 AM
John Keeling and Derek Prentice game me a bottle last week, which I'm hauling across Britain and Belgium to get home. (They gave us three other beers as well.) It's heavy and it makes no sense, but I'll be importing it this way nevertheless.
I had a tipple at the brewery, by the way, which is the reason I'm committed to hauling it.
olllllo - November 16, 2011 11:43 AM
Bought three, had two, gave away one. Then I noticed I was out.
Explain this bout of amnesia since Saturday.
John Coates - November 20, 2011 10:26 PM
I always debate this - more for me, more for me to share and spread the good word of beer or more for others to buy and build the craft beer market through availability (I need to find out who else buys these beers). At the same time, we need to guarantee sales so these come back to the LCBO (numbers, numbers, numbers).