Here is the thing. I am allergic to sulphites. Monosodium bisuphite is a killer to me. Gives me a respiratory reaction, like asthma. It's in some beers. Apparently proposals for beer labeling in Canada would include declarations that sulphites are in the beer:
The labelling changes, first announced in July 2008, would make it easier for people with allergies to understand what's in their food. The new regulations would call for clearer language on their ingredient lists and would alert consumers whether the food or beverage contains one of more of 10 known allergens, such as milk, eggs, nuts or sulphites. If the product contained gluten, it would have to list the source of the gluten, such as wheat, rye or barley. The regulations would apply to all packaged foods, as well as wine, beer, vinegar and spirits.
Some wines already declare whether they are sulphite free so what is the big deal? I really do not mind this law but I am not sure how it would have helped me. One little problem I have is that MSBS is often not listed on ingredient lists as it is added in the wholesale stage, especially on "fresh fruit" additions to otherwise packaged foods. It's chucked on in the farm to factory or factory to bulk goo stages. Once, I needed an inhaler after drinking a diet soda pop with "fresh lemon flavour." The good thing is that goo is only in the crap food anyway. Best to avoid it. Plus, best of all, the cure seems to be the application of a mild a relaxant... like alcohol. And, through avoidance of the likely suspects, I have not had any real problems for well over a decade.
But sulphites can occur naturally in beer, included in the hard water like at Burton. And before I knew what was going on, I coughed for a year. Had a zillion visits to specialists and no one had a clue what was up. So, would this have helped me or not?






Comments
Ken Tucker - January 25, 2011 9:33 PM
nothing wrong with 'full disclosure'.
and, i've got a way to do it, virtually, taking next to no 'space' on the label.
stay tuned for the products coming outta NY's Adirondacks under the ADKBREWCO (Adirondack Brewers Coalition) auspices.
Robert Geczi - January 26, 2011 2:32 AM
Coming from a person who also suffers from quite a bit of allergies, having more info posted on labels would be much appreciated. Even if something naturally occurs, and is not considered an additive, still. More info is better than little.
Craig - January 26, 2011 8:09 AM
I'm allergic to pine sap. Bringing in the Christmas tree really sucks. I don't have high hopes for pine tree labeling.
Barm - January 26, 2011 12:32 PM
But how is a small brewery to know which compounds and how much of them might naturally occur in their beer, without submitting every batch for costly analysis?
Pok - January 26, 2011 1:36 PM
I think scpeticism should be a first line of approach when dealing with the sulfite (not sulphate) issue. Many claim to have allergy to sulfite in wine but can happily ingest several dried apricots (very high in sulfites) or other dried fruits.
As I understand it all beer and wine contains sulfites that are a natural part of fermenting organic materials. Many wines contain extra sulfites added to prevent oxidation - not sure if brewers do this as well. At any rate I don't beleive there is such thing as "sulfite free" - just some wines and foods that have no additional sulfite added.
So a label saying "sulfite free" to me is negative. Whereas "sulfites added" would be much more acceptable.
Alan - January 26, 2011 2:00 PM
I doubt not my claim in the slightest. Apricots floor me but you can get less neon (turd like) alternatives. Takes living with something to dispel recreational skepticism.
Pok - January 26, 2011 2:21 PM
Not doubting your diagnosis - just illuminating the fact that many tend to assign "sulfite allergy" to any and all adverse reactions to wines, and now it seems, beer.