This moment in the lives of a couple of small town Canadian firefighters has got me thinking:
As the smouldering site was being demolished, some firefighters noticed the six kegs of beer and decided to save the valuable merchandise, Oliver Mayor Pat Hampson told The Province Monday night. But instead of turning the salvaged suds over to the police, the kegs were taken to the Oliver firehall for safekeeping. “The unfortunate part is the owners didn’t know [the kegs] had been removed,” said Hampson. “While they were at the firehall, somebody decided to open one up.” Hampson called the incident “very serious.” “Two firefighters were suspended as punishment for what we consider inappropriate actions,” said Hampson. “The police have completed their investigation,” he said, adding he is unaware whether any charges have been recommended. “There was no malice aforethought.”
One former local fire chief noted that usually the valuables are turned over to the police in a situation like this. But was the beer valuable? Surely no one would consider reselling the beer that has been through a fire. There is now way it could have been sold after that point. But the keg that was tapped was clearly operable, reusable and not their property. Yet, look at the photo with the story - the place was a total write off. These two firemen just risked their lives for the community good and only wanted a little beer.
The fire department is taking out an ad to apologize. Would they have done that if it was a bakery and the firemen had nicked a couple of miraculously saved peanut butter cookies? I think the bar owner should give the firefighters some back up and say they are welcome at his next place anytime. But that is me. Would Fireman Sam have done? He is my true ethical guide in such matters.






Comments
Stephen Beaumont - June 23, 2010 12:06 PM
If the bar owner wished to thank the firefighters by giving them one or all of the kegs, then that's his or her prerogative. But a single keg of beer is worth up to $200, so we're reasonably talking about $1000 or so worth of merchandise, which no matter how you look at it, did not belong to the fire department.
Verdict: ethically unsound.
Alan - June 23, 2010 12:22 PM
What if they tapped of a couple of pitchers of the unsaleable valueless draft on their way to returning the kegs? The contents of a single keg of beer that has been through a fire is nothing but an item on an insurance claim.
Stephen Beaumont - June 24, 2010 10:15 AM
Unsaleable, yes, but obviously not undrinkable, judging from the firefighters' actions. So if the owner of the bar had wanted to drown his or her sorrows in beer that he or she owned, that should have been their choice to make. And if they wanted to invite the firefighters to the kegger, so be it, but that choice should not have been removed.
Alan - June 24, 2010 10:28 AM
Yes, I think that is the ethical route.
That being said (and maybe its because I work with firefighters) but I would think a better community outcome would have been a thank you event rather than the humiliation of those who go into harm's way. But the two fire fighters may have simply made that practically impossible. Wonder how generally socially conservative the town is?
Alan - July 7, 2010 10:09 PM
This is how fire fighters respond.