I am all for the global marketplace and beer being something to share around the planet. Heck, just today I secured a really dandy set of prizes for the 2008 photo contest from a noted Scottish brewery as well as a distributor of fine imports into North American - but are you really surprised by this bit of news out of the UK?
Scottish and Newcastle UK said it had reached agreement with Miller Brands UK to end the contract to brew, market and distribute Miller Beer in the UK with effect from December 2008. The standard lager will be withdrawn from sale in the UK market from early 2009. Mark Gerken, off-trade sales managing director at S&N UK, said: “We are committed to supplying our customers with brands that meet today’s consumer needs. The decision to withdraw Miller Beer from sale in the UK will allow us to fulfil this objective by drawing upon the combined S&N/Heineken range to create new and greater sales opportunities for our customers in 2009.”
How could this be? Did they think to try calling it MacMiller? Or maybe O'Miller? Lord Miller's Pale Ale perhaps? This sector of the beer trade means little to me but it is quite massive. What could Miller have meant to an English beer drinker? Was it the darling with flour manufacturers? It must have been something as, the article tells us, Miller Beer’s off-trade sales were worth £17 million - but they fell by 12% in the year to Oct 4. So in some many ways it seems that the message of the over-layering container design for a beer that tastes like "X" failed as a brand and now needs to be replaced by another over-layering container design.
The magic of branding.
Comments
The Beer Nut - November 4, 2008 6:48 AM
I'll be expecting the same thing here.
Each of Ireland's Big Three brewers had an American macrolager in their contract-brew portfolio: Diageo make Bud; Heineken make Coors Light; S&N made Miller. So now that the Big Three is down to a Big Two, I'm guessing we'll lose our Miller.
I can't answer what Miller meant to the English drinker, but according to an internal document of S&N's Irish operation (quoted here): "we wish to be considered a credible alternative to Budweiser. Budweiser stands for brash America and MGD to stand for urban cool America."
Funny word, "credible".
Alan - November 4, 2008 7:09 AM
"...Budweiser stands for brash America and MGD to stand for urban cool America..."
How bizzare. Each stand for cheap ass $3.99 six-packs in roadside gas station coolers to me. Beer to drink when you have run out of dough.
The Beer Nut - November 4, 2008 10:33 AM
Over here they cost as much as, and often more than, local microbrews. They're "premium" dontcherknow. And all that TV airtime costs money.
Ron Pattinson - November 4, 2008 10:48 AM
I'm sure Beer Nut is right - it's all to do with the takeover of S & N by Heineken and Carlsberg. Whay would they want to brew a brand from one of their megabrewery rivals?
Joe Jacobs - December 1, 2008 11:01 AM
Now, if we could only get Miller to pull themselves out of the American market as well...
jim - October 7, 2009 8:19 PM
Beer pricing is out of control.
Its less expensive and more rewarding to enjoy a bottle of three buck chuck (wine) than to consume overpriced beer.
Beer producers need to fund their own health and retirement benefits, like the rest of us, from their own inflated salaries.
henry roberson - November 29, 2009 12:32 PM
hello why dont you make six packs of miller beer some time we dont want 12 pack so when will you start makeing six packs
henry roberson - November 29, 2009 12:33 PM
i live in north carolina and hope you start makeing six pack soon