A Good Beer Blog

Comments

Ron Pattinson -

How odd we should both post about Burton.

The 666 looks about the right colour. Strange that the brewery should describe it as a Pale Ale given that it's brown.

I'm not sure what you could classify Sam Smith's Winter Welcome as. It's certainly not the right colour for a Burton.

Zythophile -

The give-aways for identifying a Burton Ale, apart from colour (dark amber/cornelian) are a definite sweetness coming through the hop biterness, and a distinct fruitiness, which is the real identifier. Sometimes, in poorer examples, you can get a tinny or metallic flavour, which I have seen remarked upon as a characteristic of Burtons in a book from the 1930s. Although modern drinkers wouldn't categorise them so, even in the 1950s Burtons were described as "of the pale ale class", apparently in contrast to stouts and porters.

Alan -

This may well be the beast, then...as it were.

irishkyle -

They way the bottles are placed in the picture and they way you describe the color of the beers does not make sense to me. "As you can see, the Winter Welcome 2007-08 is much lighter, the dark amber orange ale sitting under white foam and rim. By comparison, the 666 is darker - chestnut with a fine rich tan rim and foam".

The Great Lakes 666 is the lighter colored beer and the Winter Welcome is much darker.

irishkyle -

Nevermind my post. The mistake was on my end of things.

Alan -

No problem. I am the possessor of a "right" and "the other right" so I do the same thing.

CanadianAmerican -

I live in Ontario, and this is my favorite Canadian beer at the moment. Unlike most Canadian brews, this beer has a bit of a punch.

Post a Comment: Ontario: 666, Devil's Pale Ale, Great Lakes Brewing, Etobicoke

Email addresses are not displayed with your comment and will not be shared.
Allowed tags are: <em>, <strong>, <code> and <a href="url">. All other tags will be displayed as plain text.