A lighter pale ale at 4.1%, it is named after an regular at one of Young's pubs in London which is 260 years old this year. The regular attended the establishment in the 1700s and his smelliness has been remembered through the centuries - Nathaniel Bentley was his name (which leads to a number of questions we need not pursue.) Here is the tale from a pub locator web site:
Nathaniel Bentley was an ironmonger who had a shop in Leadenhall Street. On the eve of his wedding, tragedy struck. His bride-to-be died. So distraught was Nathaniel that he locked up the room in which he had prepared the wedding feast, never to enter it again. A broken man, he neither washed or changed his clothes. When his cats died he just left them. The English love an eccentric and his notoriety meant his business flourished. When Nathaniel retired in 1804, the landlord of the Old Port Wine Shop in Bishopsgate bought the contents lock, stock and dead cats. He put them on display at his pub and renamed it "Dirty Dick's". In 1870 the pub was rebuilt from ground level, the wine vaults are part of the original building. The "dirty" contents were carefully relocated in the new pub. Sadly it was decided in the mid nineteen-eighties that a clean up was in order and the dirty artifacts were cleared away. Today's cleaned-up pub is pleasant with bare floor boards and an abundance of timber beams. The upstairs bar forms a gallery and the vaulted cellar houses the restaurant.Sure - blame the 80s for that, too.
But enough of the dirty man. The ale is nice but nothing to not wash over. Lace leaving off-white over orangey-amber. Not a lot of hop on the nose and in the mouth it is more about edge with a bit of twig. The malt is sweetish giving a little more body than the strength might make you expect. It is grainy, grapy juicey with some autumn apple - better malt than this has. A perfectly fine if unflowery pale ale. Some BAers say it's a session ale but I really don't see spending an evening with this. Others are calling it a mild when it is a run of the mill lower hopped best bitter or even a light ale...though Young's Light Ale runs at 3.2%. Whatever it is...it's a wee bit dull for me. Oddly, it is not listed on Young's site as one of their brands and they have new labels.






Comments
Knut Albert Solem - September 2, 2005 2:17 AM
No. it's not listed on their web site. It may be because it is not widely available - originally this was brewed for the pub of the same name alone, and I do not see it much around the Young's pubs.
Not that I ask for it, don't get me on a rant again (http://www.beerblog.motime.com/post/484972) about their Special London Ale, which is bottled magic.
BTW, I remember reading somewhere that at one time there was half a dozen "Dirty Dick" pubs in London, with cobwebs and everything. But that was way before they saw the enormous potential of fake Irish theme pubs, which have since conquered the world. (And has the world become a better place? The jury is still out.)
Alan - September 2, 2005 8:51 AM
Did I mention I have a wee SLA in the stash?
Knut Albert Solem - September 5, 2005 4:16 AM
Chase the rest of the family out, or wait until they are asleep. Turn off the phone. Some pistachio nuts or a slice of mature stilton, perhaps? Enjoy!
Alan - September 5, 2005 9:17 AM
I did secure four oatmeal stouts when south Saturday.
douglas bentley - October 6, 2005 3:51 PM
"Nathaniel Bentley was his name (which leads to a number of questions we need not pursue." what exactly does this mean? i would love to know.is there some english cultural joke about the bentley's? im just wondering. i find this very interesting. oh yeah. i think that the dirty dicks ale is good, but its not youngs best work. i prefer the london ale
thanks,
db
Alan - October 6, 2005 7:00 PM
Hah! I have no clue now what I meant when I wrote this. It is mysterious even at the mere gap of five weeks.